Home/Essays Examples/Economics/Rental Accommodation Market and Price Control

Rental Accommodation Market and Price Control

The reason why governments establish a binding price ceiling in the market for rental accommodation?

A price ceiling is an administration enforced frontier on the price charged for the product. Administration introduces a price ceiling in the marketplace when representatives believe that the market price of goods and services is unfair to the seller and consumer. The government can secure a legally legislated maximum price in a market that traders cannot exceed to evade the market price from increasing above a guaranteed level.

The operational determining value has to be secure below the free market price. Maximum prices seek out to regulate the price and also intricate in a normative conclusion on behalf of the administration about what the price of products should be. Price ceiling and incompetent pricing remain to dominate several markets (Arnott 1995, p.99). Private companies can be just as unproductive with central valuing as administrations can be with a price ceiling.

What is the market for rental accommodation earlier and after the introduction of rent controls?

Rent control denotes laws or verdicts that fix price controls on the leasing of residential housing. It works as a price ceiling. Rent control rules vary from one nation to another and might be different from one authority to another. Rent control is a workout of imposing a legal maximum rent ceiling upon the rental fee in a specific housing market below the equilibrium (Arnott 1995, p.99).

By and large, rent control had remained obligatory during World Wars to provide pardon from the economic or political amazements that followed in the post wars’ period. The appropriateness of impressive controls in a period of war seems to be almost undoubted. The belief is that the arrival of soldiers would upset a speedy and worrying increase in the rental fee, and the burden of rent control would comprise tiny efficiency.

The price ceilings fixed above the free marketplace equilibrium price have no significance to the market. The product scarcity will arise when dominant judgment fixes price below equilibrium, and customers are likely to purchase more than they would buy at the equilibrium, while suppliers want to supply less than they would do at the equilibrium price. The product surplus will occur when the price is set above the equilibrium price. Customers will be eager to purchase at less cost than they would do at the lower equilibrium price.


According to the graph above, the supply and demand intersect to decide the free marketplace quantity and value. Though often rent control reinforced as a means of price regulator has become a tool to guarantee housing affordability, it is necessary to maintain local rents from their rising to overprice.

The price ceiling affects customers and manufacturers

The price ceiling affects customers and manufacturers as shown in the diagram. The capacity delivered diminishes to output Q2 that customers achieve from the price being fixed preciously lesser than the equilibrium. The manufacturer surplus is abridged to a lower level P maximum.

How does a “Black Market” operate, and who benefits and who loses from its operation?

The black market is the interchange of merchandise, goods, and services which are concealed from the authorized assessment. The black market has changed as policymakers redefine what is illegal. The point that it is concealed from authority sight may enforce unique charges on members and make an opening for monopoly as well as boosting fierceness. The black market operates in such a way that assured customers are equipped to rent at higher prices to obtain the service they need. Wherever there are expensive products, they may also be assigned on a first-come, first-served basis. When there is a shortage of rental houses, higher prices act as a regulating factor. Traders might also assign rare goods by renting only to favorite consumers.

Black Market

Administration execution aptitude grows considerably, but the issue of the “black market” will probably remain unsolved. Implementation is particularly problematic when politically operational electorates do not clearly state what is outlined as illegal.

Customers sometimes can be in a superior condition through the black market mostly when the administration code of practice hampers what would the other way be a genuine modest service. The supply benefits from the “black market” by renting the house at a higher price, and the consumer who can afford rent also benefits from getting the quality house. Consumers with ready cash to rent apartments to some extent appear to be losers because they tend to spend more on rent (Anas & Arnott 2002). The definite losers are the consumers who have no money to rent at a higher price.

What other problems arise with the introduction of rent controls?

With the introduction of rent control “shortage” problems, if the rent ceiling is lower than equilibrium rent, the quantity of housing units required by renters surpasses the capacity provided by the property owners. The landlord is not enforced to supply more units than the supply curve demands. The quantity of housing units leased equals the quantity supplied. This causes scarcity in the rental housing market (Arnott & Johnston 1981). The figure below shows the scarcity of the apartment when the price ceiling is enforced on the supplier.

The scarcity of the apartment when the price ceiling is enforced on the supplier.

A rent ceiling makes inefficiency when it is forced to demand since, at the number of apartments that are leased, the marginal societal value surpasses the minimal societal cost. Rent ceilings are biased under the “fair rules” tactic because rent ceilings inhibit volunteer transactions (Arnott & Johnston 1981). Rent ceilings are biased under the “fair results” method because there is no guarantee that apartments go to persons with lesser incomes. Rent ceilings cause discrimination, which, perhaps, presents a contrast with justice.

What are non-price techniques of allocation that the government?

The government can use non-price methods of assigning to introduce equity by buying in bulk. The most common method is to take advantage of scales. A customer on behalf of a great volume of marketplace dealings can discuss the affordable prices to retrograde menacing integration or to move its business to a rival dealer (Arnott & Mints 1987). Information is a non-price technique of distribution that the administration could acquaint itself within an effort to attain equity and knowledgeable customers that can recognize the produce that meets his/her desires best and demand a bargain-basement price when buying a dissimilar product (Arnott & Mints 1987).

What are choices that are open to the owners of rental property choose a renter in the absence of a government method of allocation?

Some rulings let property owners increase rents on emptied units without boundary; when the unit is taken up again, the new rental fee becomes the base for successive changes. This endowment offers rent liberation to property owners, guards sitting occupants at the payment of movers, and leads to considerable variances in the rentals of indistinguishable apartments.

Property owners may get rent upsurges of distinct apartments or houses by acquiescing indication of capital enhancements, improved services, and insufficient base rentals (Arrow 1963, p. 941).

How these solutions operate and the advantage it has over the other technique?

Some rent regulator panels necessitate a property owner applying for such an upsurge to be in an accurate agreement with all the guidelines, together with those that do not have anything to do with the aims of the anticipated increase (Arrow 1963, p. 941).


Anas, A & Arnott, RJ 2002, Moving costs, security of tenure and eviction, Research Paper, Departments of Economics at the State University of New York at Buffalo, Amherst, New York. Web.

Arnott, RJ 1995, ‘Time for revisionism on rent control’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 99-120.

Arnott, RJ & Johnston, N. 1981, Rent Control and Options for Decontrol in Ontario, Ontario Economic Council, Toronto.

Arnott, RJ & Mintz, J 1987, “Rent Control: The International Experience”, in the fifth John Deutsch Roundtable on Economic Policy : Proceedings of a conference, Queen’s University.

Arrow, KJ 1963, ‘Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care’, American Economic Review, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 141-149. Web.